Pros:
- A notable boost in horsepower.
- Power vs. size: Smaller engine displacements are able to provide significantly more power in comparison to their size.
- Better fuel efficiency: Smaller engines have less rotational and reciprocating mass, which results in better fuel efficiency at idle.
- Higher efficiency: Because exhaust gases, which are used by turbochargers, are often lost in naturally aspirated and supercharged engines, recovering this energy increases the engine’s overall efficiency.
Cons:
- Turbo lag: Large turbochargers, in particular, take a while to spool up and generate useful boost.
- Boost threshold: Traditional turbochargers are frequently sized for a particular RPM range where the exhaust gas flow is sufficient to provide the engine more boost. They normally don’t cover as much of the RPM spectrum as superchargers.
- Power surge: In some turbocharger applications, particularly with larger turbos, achieving the boost threshold can create an almost instantaneous spike in power, which may affect tyre traction or result in some instability of the vehicle.
- Oil requirement: Turbochargers frequently draw from the engine’s oil supply due to their high temperature. This necessitates more plumbing and puts more strain on the engine oil. Superchargers normally don’t need to be lubricated with engine oil.
Superchargers frequently accompany large V8 engines, and they may undoubtedly generate significant power.
Simply said, turbochargers make more sense because they increase the engine’s efficiency in a variety of ways. Even though superchargers are capable of delivering useful boost at low RPM, they place an additional load on the engine.
|